Lapin wrote:mizudg wrote:
Technically... 64 is just perfect for Bettlefold. If you don't believe it, try playing on 128-player enabled server in BF2. It becomes too clustered
maybe 128~150 on Alborz mountain (only infantry)
Kerrigan wrote:Mod support has been denied officially yesterday/today.
mizudg wrote:Kerrigan wrote:Mod support has been denied officially yesterday/today.
Has there been any doubt... even if Dice want to make it, EA wont let them so they can sell their precious expansions with new weapons, maps and vehicles. PREMIUM has been confirmed since the TV Spot trailer yet they're not offering pre-orders like other games with their Season passes. Why? Because EA are money-hungry a-holes...
Project Florence maybe? LOL
Kerrigan wrote:LOL 128 players.
People.. it's still JUST a game.
The average mapsizes of Bettlefold 3 are not designed for 128 player battles.
Arma would suit that way better.
But since we're fooling around now.. how about 128 players close quarters ?! olololo
CaptainESS wrote:Kerrigan wrote:LOL 128 players.
People.. it's still JUST a game.
The average mapsizes of Bettlefold 3 are not designed for 128 player battles.
Arma would suit that way better.
But since we're fooling around now.. how about 128 players close quarters ?! olololo
They can play Planetside 2 .
Pros
- 2000 players
- Huge map ( i guess 8km x 8km )
- Not pay 2 win
- Good graphics
- You can choose the faction fits better to you
Cons
- You will need a good cpu
- Free 2 play
- Aircraft are overused
mizudg wrote:If you aren't considering the Certification system compared to the SC being P2W, then yes, it is definitely balanced..
Trust me if you are a good player you will never need to buy anything. Free weapons aren't weak compared to paid ones.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 40 guests